FIELD NOTES BLOG

AI and it's impact on Nature

Andrea Wallace
March 28, 2025

No AI tools were used in the making of this article. 


Artificial Intelligence (AI):
  the ability of a digitalcomputer or computer-controlledrobot to perform tasks commonly associated with intelligent beings. (Encyclopedia Brittanica) 


Why would a nature center, whose staff spend much of their days trotting down forest-lined trails with a pack of eager students behind them, concern themselves with an AI policy? Further, why would any organization, especially a small non-profit, concern themselves with making a policy about it? These things take time, consideration, effort, and intention. Policies are drafted by committees and voted on by boards. Is AI really worth that work?


It is, and here’s why you should care.


Whether you are a corporate employee, high school student, retiree, parent, or fellow environmental educator, AI is already changing your life. For many, it’s making jobs obsolete before our very eyes and changing a growing number of aspects of our daily lives, from search engines to healthcare decisions. The full impact of AI on society is beyond our scope as a nature center, but we’d like to tell you more about our AI policy and why we decided to write one. 


Traditional vs Generative AI

Traditional AI has been around for a while.The US Department of Defense began to develop “AI” models as early as 1960s. Traditional AI can help with automation, decision making, spotting anomalies, analyzing data sets, and more. AI works by learning from patterns in large data sets and applying mathematical models and algorithms to them. As an AI system is developed, it can adapt to changes and make predictions. (Traditional AI vs Generative AI: What’s the Difference? University of Illinois Office of Online Programs).


Generative AI has become more widely available in the past few years. This is the kind of AI you see in Chat GPT and other similar models. “
At a high level, generative models encode a simplified representation of their training data and draw from it to create a new work that’s similar, but not identical, to the original data.”  In other words, whenever AI is used to generate text, music, images, videos, and more, this is considered to be “generative AI.”


AI and Severson Dells

There are many benefits to AI. It can automate systems, cut cumbersome corners, optimize workflows, reduce redundancy, and more. AI can make lives and work easier, and many people have seen some of the ways it can do that. 


During the rise of generative AI, we, like many others looking to increase productivity, experimented with these generative AI tools. However, that didn’t last long. Our team quickly recognized the imbalance favoring risk rather than reward, which led us to develop an AI use policy.


Going into the process of writing an AI use policy and considering organizational parameters, we knew that many of the systems we use already have AI Integration. Auto-complete email suggestions, image background removers, closed-caption generators, and more are automatically included in the systems we use. A complete separation from AI and systems that use AI is nearly impossible using the digital tools needed to be successful in today's workplace.


As an organization, we knew we wanted to be thoughtful about the integration of AI into our workflows. We wanted clear limitations to when, where and how we’d use it, and for what reason. Thoughtful self-regulation and accountability were important to us, especially as an nature-based organization considering the environmental impacts of AI. That’s why we implemented an AI policy created using current best practices with input from staff and approved by our board of directors.


AI and Environment

Anytime we turn on a computer or type in a search bar, we are using energy. Cloud computing- which is the on-demand use of servers, storage, databases, networking, analytics, and more through the internet- is responsible for2.5-3.7% of all global greenhouse gas emissions. We can expect greenhouse gas emissions generated by cloud computing to increase even more with increased AI use, as “generative AI training cluster might consume seven or eight times more energy than a typical computing workload.” (Norman Bashir, lead author of the impact paper, who is a Computing and Climate Impact Fellow at MIT Climate and Sustainability Consortium (MCSC) and a postdoc in the Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL). A traditional search engine response takes 30 times less energy than an AI-generated one. Generating 2 AI images takes as much energy as charging a cell phone. 


Data centers alone are “
expected to approach 1,050 terawatts (which would bump data centers up to fifth place on the global list, between [the nations of] Japan and Russia)” in electricity consumption by 2026.” It’s possible that “data centers could contribute more than 60% of incremental US power demand through the end of the century.” Some potential solutions to minimize the environmental toll of data centersinclude: purchasing carbon credits to offset emissions, investing in smaller language models, adjusting workloads around peak energy demand times, optimizing chips for efficiency instead of power, and tracking energy usage.

Generative AI requires more than just energy to function. Every time someone types into Chat GPT or uses any cloud computing, the data processors generate heat that would slow computing and lead to dangerous conditions for the physical centers if left unchecked. Most centers use chilled water to absorb heat in data centers and therefore cool them. 


Our team has spent the last two winters visiting schools to teach about water as a resource, so we know a thing or two about water in human systems. Water, especially freshwater, is a valuable resource. Only .075% of the earth’s water is fresh surface water in liquid form. Global AI use of water will soon be
6 times more than the country of Denmark. Water usage for AI is expected to hit a staggering 1,743,535,545,564 gallons of water by 2027. , which is alarming considering a  quarter of humanity already lacks access to clean water and sanitation. 


There are more environmental impacts of AI usage, including mining for the rare earth minerals to make processors that can keep up with the demands of AI.
A 2 kg computer requires 800 kg of raw materials to manufacture, and data centers operate on a much larger scale than that. Further, data centers inevitably result in more electronic waste with substances like mercury and lead. 


It’s not to say that AI has to be the antithesis to environmental causes. AI can be used to improve the implementation of renewable resources like
wind energy, make choices for transportation efficiency, aggregating and visualizingclimate data, monitoring air pollution,  and more. AI’s power and potential cannot be denied, but it requires thoughtful and transparent implementation.


AI and Plagiarism

We believe in giving credit where credit is due at Severson Dells. That’s why you will always see us crediting sources and partners. We ask for parent and participant permission before taking photos at our programs and sharing them with others. We securely store participant information and disclose how feedback is used and shared when we ask for it in forms. These are just some of the ways we try to be ethical when working with other people and their likeness, information, and intellectual property.


The same lengths are not taken when industries create these massive AI models.
Google has disclosed that many of its AI products and services are trained on personal information scraped from the web. Several lawsuits are underway against Open AI, Meta, and other tech companies like the class action lawsuit PM v. Open AI LP, which claims “stolen private information, including personally identifiable information, from hundreds of millions of internet users, including children of all ages, without their informed knowledge or consent."This means that, to some degree, every word written with AI is created without consent from and credit to its original source. 


Without clear disclosure about where data is sourced from to train these models, we consider it a sort of plagiarism to use AI to generate educational text, images, or videos on our behalf. Out of an abundance of caution, we will only use AI tools to alter images or text that are ours or we have clear permission to use. This could look like removing the background on an image, extending an image to fit a different frame, or reviewing text for grammatical errors. 


AI and Factual Literacy

When you pick up a box of cereal, you can flip to the back of the box and know what’s in it. You can trust that it was reviewed by multiple people to ensure that the ingredients are factual and prepared in a way that is safe for consumption. Nail-polish removers have “flammable” labels and cleaning products directions on how to properly use them. Labels and review processes ensure that we know what we are using and consuming so we can make choices for our safety.


As of now, there is no mandate for disclosing the use of AI when making products. If you scroll down a social media page, it’s likely that you will encounter pictures, videos and recipes that are shared by people who have no idea they were created by AI. Sure, it would be annoying to waste precious eggs in an AI-recipe that flops, but the consequences can be even more dire.


One example we see in nature community is AI generated field guides that have not been reviewed or labeled as AI generated. If you were to search for “foraging books” on Amazon, many of the top results have all of the telltale signs of being AI-generated. Take the “
Forager’s Harvest Bible” by “Hector Lawson” for example. Hector Lawson seemingly appeared out of nowhere- searches for him or his picture only link back to this book. His biography lacks any information of substance: no places of study, mentors in the field, city where he grew up, favorite foraging memories, nothing. It includes no actual plant images, has haphazard organization, and missing important sections like poisonous look-alikes. Experts in the field are concerned that this book, and the many like it, could lead to people accidentally foraging poisonous plants. In this case, the lack of disclosure and review “could lead to people dying” says foraging guide author Alan Bergo.


This issue extends beyond foraging guides. It will grow harder and harder to tell what images, video, audio, and text that we encounter online will be AI-generated or real. It’s a detriment to the work we do at Severson Dells to teach people about the real nature around us and promote scientific literacy, and we acknowledge that it will impact almost every aspect of media. This could give validation to the “Dead Internet Theory” (read more about
here) and fundamentally change how we find and distinguish factual information.


AI and Community Connection


We also view our communication platforms, whether they be our newsletters, emails, phone calls, social media posts, or blogs as an opportunity to connect with real humans and tell stories that are unique to us. No AI model can fully understand or capture the thrill of finding a crayfish under a rock or the smell of our forest after a rain. AI models will never recreate the joy pouring off of a family laughing in the Grove, or what a field trip lesson means to each individual student. We do our best to convey the whole scope of our work at Severson to you through the use of human tools, because we feel that humans can understand that best.


What can you do?

In this era, it is impossible to be a bystander in terms of AI. Our choices are limited: stay offline, regulate our use of AI, or use AI without boundaries. We think it’s important to be thoughtful about our use of AI, and encourage you to do the same.


Here are some action steps you can take personally:

  • Think about what you use AI for and why you are using it. What do you gain from that use?
  • Consider the environmental and social impacts of AI. Do you think the pros outweigh the cons for you?
  • If you see a business or organization using AI, ask them if they have considered an AI policy. Point out the benefits and downsides of AI, especially generative AI, and offer your own thoughts on the matter.
  • If you see a friend use generative AI or share something made by generative AI, ask them what they know about the impacts of AI. Encourage them to consider the environmental impacts of their usage. 


Cindy Gordon, Forbes Contributor and CEO of SalesChoice, encourages business leaders to reflect on
these three questions:

1. What is the impact of your AI strategy on water consumption, and how are you planning to replenish what you are draining from the Earth?

2. Will your investments in AI create more social problems than benefits?

3. Have you quantified the social risks in your AI investment business cases, and is your board involved in reviewing the stakeholder and brand reputation risks to your ESG goals?


The UN Environmental Programme has these recommendations for the global scale:

  1.  Countries can establish standardized procedures for measuring the environmental impact of AI; right now, there’s a dearth of reliable information on the subject.
  2. With support from UNEP, governments can develop regulations that require companies to disclose the direct environmental consequences of AI-based products and services.
  3. Tech companies can make AI algorithms more efficient, reducing their demand for energy, while recycling water and reusing components where feasible.
  4. Fourthly, countries can encourage companies to green their data centres, including by using renewable energy and offsetting their carbon emissions. 
  5. Finally, countries can weave their AI-related policies into their broader environmental regulations.


If you would like to know more specifics about our AI policy, please contact us at andrea@seversondells.org


Sources

https://education.illinois.edu/about/news-events/news/article/2024/11/11/what-is-generative-ai-vs-ai


https://www.forbes.com/sites/cindygordon/2024/02/25/ai-is-accelerating-the-loss-of-our-scarcest-natural-resource-water/


https://news.mit.edu/2025/explained-generative-ai-environmental-impact-0117


https://theshiftproject.org/en/article/lean-ict-our-new-report/


https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/ai-has-environmental-problem-heres-what-world-can-do-about


https://www.un.org/en/global-issues/water


https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.03271


https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/der2024_en.pdf


https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-do-googles-ai-answers-cost-the-environment/


https://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.16863


https://www.bcg.com/publications/2024/ceos-achieving-ai-and-climate-goals?utm_source=search&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=ceo-agenda&utm_description=paid&utm_topic=ceo-role&utm_geo=global&utm_content=dsa_achieving-ai-climate-goals&gad_source=1&gclid=CjwKCAjw7pO_BhAlEiwA4pMQvBcfX5vKcpkz4zKtb5lLevIlJiVVSwVeYiGYHPL25L51g6qUS2bmOhoCUOMQAvD_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds


https://deepmind.google/discover/blog/machine-learning-can-boost-the-value-of-wind-energy/


https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/01/artificial-intelligence-climate-transition-drive-growth/


https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/how-artificial-intelligence-helping-tackle-environmental-challenges


https://www.amazon.com/Foragers-Harvest-Bible-Identification-Preparations/dp/B0CGYWNL27?ref_=ast_author_dp


https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/ai-foraging-guides


https://www.forbes.com/sites/danidiplacido/2024/01/16/the-dead-internet-theory-explained/
 


RECENT ARTICLES

By Rowan Mermel April 23, 2025
“Once you see it you can’t unsee it”
April 22, 2025
From the rugged peaks of the Rocky Mountains to golden desert canyons, the rolling prairies to the ancient, mist-shrouded Appalachian mountains — America is a land rich in many beauties. We are home to the towering redwoods of the west coast, sun-drenched coastlines in the south, and the deep blues of the Great Lakes that collectively hold the largest volume of freshwater on Earth. These wild places offer a kind of quiet that stirs the soul. This vast, varied land is what we proudly call “America the Beautiful.” And on Earth Day, this is the America we celebrate. We scroll through snapshots of National Parks, photos of mountain trails, canyon vistas, tidepools, and wildflower filled prairies. Maybe we've seen these places with our own eyes — maybe we carry them like a dream we hope to one day reach. We’ve all, in some way, been struck by the beauty of this land. As I write these words, I’m sitting at my desk looking out the window into the woodland of Severson Dells, watching the first green buds emerge, listening to the fluting whistles of returning songbirds. How lucky are we to live among such beauty? But that beauty is in danger. Today, mountaintops in Appalachia are being blown apart for coal, their peaks stripped and valleys buried in rubble. Ancient forests in the Pacific Northwest are leveled for lumber, their centuries-old trees felled in minutes. Oil rigs rise like metal skeletons in Alaska’s fragile tundra, while pipelines thread through sacred Indigenous lands and important wildlife corridors. Wetlands that once buffered our coastlines from hurricanes are drained and filled. Prairies, once stretching unbroken across the heart of the continent like an ocean of grass, are disappearing under pavement and plow. Our coastlines are receding. Our coral reefs, once vibrant, are dying, bleaching bone-white. Even here, outside my window, invasive honeysuckle strangles the understory where spring ephemerals once bloomed, and the chorus of birds is quieter than it used to be — a stark reminder that nearly one-third of North American bird populations have vanished in the past fifty years. But this isn’t a new story. Ours is not the first generation to witness the cost of ‘progress’. The tension between beauty and destruction has shaped this nation since the Industrial Revolution. And while the challenges we face today are daunting, they are not insurmountable. Every year, on April 22nd, we celebrate Earth Day – a day that itself was born from a moment not unlike our own. America of the 1950’s and 60’s is almost unrecognizable from the America we know today. In 1943, Los Angeles residents awoke one morning to skies so dark and chemical-laden they feared they were under a gas attack . It was smog. Just 5 years later, a lethal blanket of smog from zinc smelters in Pennsylvania killed 20 people in just three days . The Merrimack River in New Hampshire ran a different color each day , depending on what the local mills were dumping. And in 1969, Cleveland's Cuyahoga River — thick with oil and industrial waste — burst into flames , its smoke billowing four stories high. These weren’t isolated incidents. They were the symptoms of a larger crisis—one brought on by decades of industrial expansion with few, if any, environmental safeguards. At the same time that America was enjoying unprecedented prosperity, it was also polluting its air, poisoning its rivers, and sickening its people. The economy boomed, but the environmental consequences were growing harder to ignore. In 1962, a marine biologist named Rachel Carson published Silent Spring, a book that would become a cornerstone of the modern environmental movement. Carson’s work focused on the effects of chemical pesticides—especially DDT—on ecosystems and human health. She warned of a future without birdsong, where toxins accumulated in the food chain and sickened both wildlife and people. Silent Spring struck a chord. It didn’t just present scientific facts, it gave voice to a deep, growing unease. People were already noticing the changes around them: the absence of fireflies in summer, the increasing number of fish kills in local lakes, the haze that lingered over cities for days. Carson’s words helped connect the dots, and it didn’t just inform, it inspired, and from it spurred the beginning of the environmental movement. By the late 1960s, a wave of activism was sweeping the country. Young people were leading protests against the Vietnam War, civil rights leaders were marching for justice, and college campuses had become hotbeds of political energy. Watching this cultural shift with inspiration was Senator Gaylord Nelson of Wisconsin. A long-time advocate for environmental protection, Nelson saw how the antiwar movement had galvanized young people—and he wondered whether that same passion could be channeled into fighting a different kind of crisis: the growing threat to America’s air, water, and land. His sense of urgency only deepened in early 1969, when tragedy struck the California coast. A blowout at a Union Oil drilling platform off the coast of Santa Barbara spilled nearly 100,000 barrels of crude oil into the Pacific Ocean . Black sludge washed up on miles of pristine beaches. Seabirds lay dying under slicks of oil. Dolphins and seals washed ashore. The air reeked of petroleum for weeks. The images were devastating—and they were broadcast into homes across the nation. Senator Nelson knew the time to act was now. In November of that year, he announced plans for a "National Teach-In on the Crisis of the Environment" —a day when Americans would come together to learn, protest, and push for meaningful environmental change. This name was later changed to Earth Day, and the date chosen was April 22, 1970—strategically placed between spring break and final exams to ensure strong participation on college campuses.  To bring this ambitious vision to life, Nelson turned to Denis Hayes, a 25-year-old student activist. With Hayes’ help, a 7 month timeline, and a shoestring budget of just $124,000, Earth Day sparked an unprecedented nationwide movement. College campuses began planning teach-ins and events. Newspapers picked up the story. Civic groups, churches, and schools joined in. The momentum built quickly—and organically. Within a few months, the Earth Day idea had become a nationwide grassroots event supported by millions of people. Colleges campuses across the country organized “teach- ins”, and major newspapers were writing about Senator Nelson's ideas. Earth Day may have been Gaylord Nelson’s idea, but American citizens made it happen. “Earth Day worked because of the spontaneous response at the grassroots level,” reflected Gaylord Nelson. “It organized itself.” Historian Adam Rome would later call it “the most famous unknown event in modern American history.” On April 22, 1970, an estimated 20 million Americans—nearly 10% of the U.S. population at the time —participated in what remains the largest single-day political demonstration in the nation’s history. People from all walks of life gathered for marches, cleanups, rallies, and teach-ins. The message was clear: the environment mattered, and the public was ready to fight for it. What made Earth Day so powerful was not just its scale, but its unity. The movement crossed ideological lines. It was bipartisan, supported by both Democrats and Republicans. At a time of deep national division, Earth Day reminded Americans that the health of our planet is a shared responsibility—and a common cause. Even more remarkable is that this enormous, coordinated event was pulled off without the tools we rely on today. No social media. No email. No cell phones. Just passionate people, printed flyers, rotary phones, and the belief that change was possible. The success of Earth Day didn’t just move the public—it resonated with leaders in Washington, and led to real change. In just a few years, the United States went from having almost no federal environmental policy to enacting an environmental policy infrastructure strong enough to slow down the era of unregulated industrial sprawl to protect our planet and public health. The success of the first Earth Day led to the passage of some of the most important environmental legislation in American history, including: The Clean Air Act (1970) The Clean Water Act (1972) The Endangered Species Act (1973) President Richard Nixon oversaw the establishment of the Environmental Protection Agency and signed the above landmark environmental laws into effect. In a 1970 speech, Nixon captured the spirit of the moment with a message that still rings true today: “The great question of the seventies is, shall we surrender to our surroundings, or shall we make our peace with nature and begin to make reparations for the damage we have done to our air, to our land, and to our water? Restoring nature to its natural state is a cause beyond party and beyond factions. It has become a common cause of all the people of this country. It is a cause of particular concern to young Americans, because they, more than we, will reap the grim consequences of our failure to act on programs which are needed now if we are to prevent disaster later. Clean air, clean water, open spaces—these should once again be the birthright of every American. If we act now, they can be. We still think of air as free. But clean air is not free, and neither is clean water. The price tag on pollution control is high. Through our years of past carelessness we incurred a debt to nature, and now that debt is being called. ” In the years that followed the first Earth Day, America made progress—rivers stopped catching fire, cities began to breathe a little easier, and wildlife rebounded. But the work was never meant to end in the 1970s. Earth Day is a reminder that the environment is not a limitless resource, and that protecting it requires action, accountability, and cooperation. Fifty five years later we face new environmental challenges, but Earth day is a reminder of what we can accomplish when we come together, regardless of party or background, to protect the natural world we all share. Today, the landmark pieces of legislation that were established in the 1970’s are under threat. The first hit to the Clean Water Act was the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Sackett v. EPA, which significantly narrowed the Act's scope, limiting protections for wetlands and many streams. This ruling has led to a significant weakening of federal oversight. More recently, the EPA has announced significant changes to the Clean Water Act that potentially puts the drinking water sources for tens of millions of Americans at risk. As for the Endangered Species Act, there is a proposed rule change that would limit violations of the Act only to actions that hurt or kill animals. Harming the habitats the endangered animals need to survive would no longer be a violation of the Endangered Species Act, which would open large swaths of land to logging, mining and development that were previously protected. As we all know, if a species doesn’t have the habitat to survive and breed in then it will eventually go extinct. This proposed rule change is open for public comment until May 19 in the Federal Register, so please consider sharing your opinion . Additionally, there is the Zero-Based Regulatory Budgeting To Unleash American Energy Executive Order. The legal community is still trying to figure out just how far reaching this EO is, but it is likely to have a significant impact on a wide range of environmental regulations. These threats to the health of our environment put “America the Beautiful” at risk. The spacious skies, amber waves of grain, purple mountain majesties, and the fruited plain from sea to shining sea are left vulnerable. Now more than ever, Earth Day calls on all of us to act to protect our beautiful environment. Earth Day is now celebrated in over 190 countries. But its roots lie in a time when people refused to accept the destruction of the world around them as inevitable. So, what will you do this Earth Day? Because history has shown us: when people care, when they act together, the world changes. The debt to nature is still being called—and we still have the power to answer. This Earth Day, don’t just celebrate – participate. Plant a tree. Call your representatives. Learn the name of the bird outside your window. Donate to organizations that support our natural lands, our water, and our future. Vote. Teach your children not just to love the Earth, but to fight for it. Talk about climate change, even when it’s hard. Especially when it’s hard. Use your voice, use your art, use your science. Join a local cleanup, start a compost bin, reduce your plastic use. Talk to your neighbors. Talk to your parents. Talk to your children. You can’t wait for someone else to take action. You don’t need to be perfect. You don’t need to do everything. But you do need to begin. Because the Earth doesn’t need more perfect people, it needs millions of imperfect people who care enough to act with intention everyday. Sources: Klein, Ezra, and Thompson, Derek. Abundance . Simon & Schuster, 18 March 2025 “Gaylord Nelson & Earth Day Origins.” Nelson Earth Day , https://nelsonearthday.net/gaylord-nelson-earth-day-origins/ . Accessed 18 Apr. 2025. Gammon, Katharine. “The Deadly Donora Smog of 1948 Spurred Environmental Protection—But Have We Forgotten the Lesson?” Smithsonian Magazine , 26 Oct. 2018, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/deadly-donora-smog-1948-spurred-environmental-protection-have-we-forgotten-lesson-180970533/ . Accessed 18 Apr. 2025. Lamoreaux, Naomi. “The 1943 Hellish Cloud Was the Most Vivid Warning of L.A.'s Smog Problems to Come.” Smithsonian Magazine , 15 Jan. 2018, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/1943-hellish-cloud-was-most-vivid-warning-las-smog-problems-come-180964119/ . Accessed 18 Apr. 2025. “The Merrimack River: How Revisiting Its History Helps Renew Action.” Forest Society Blog , Society for the Protection of New Hampshire Forests, 26 Sept. 2022, https://www.forestsociety.org/blog-post/merrimack-river-how-revisiting-its-history-helps-renew-action . Accessed 18 Apr. 2025. Pyne, Stephen J. “The Cuyahoga River Caught Fire at Least a Dozen Times, but No One Cared Until 1969.” Smithsonian Magazine , 22 June 2019, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/cuyahoga-river-caught-fire-least-dozen-times-no-one-cared-until-1969-180972444/ . Accessed 18 Apr. 2025. Westervelt, Eric. “How California’s Worst Oil Spill Turned Beaches Black and the Nation Green.” NPR , 28 Jan. 2019, https://www.npr.org/2019/01/28/688219307/how-californias-worst-oil-spill-turned-beaches-black-and-the-nation-green . Accessed 18 Apr. 2025.
By Emma Zimmerman April 16, 2025
Disclaimer: Severson Dells Nature Center is not a medical provider and is not giving medical advice in the following article. Please consult a licensed medical professional for any questions regarding your personal health.