FIELD NOTES BLOG

Herbicide Injuries in Our Natural Areas

Rowan Mermel
April 23, 2025

“Once you see it you can’t unsee it”

The term “shifting baseline syndrome” was coined by marine biologist Daniel Pauly in 1995 to describe a phenomenon in the study of fisheries in which each generation of researchers took the stock size and diversity at the moment they began their career to be the baseline for their research, and thus the total decline in fisheries around the world since the industrial revolution was not fully appreciated. Since then the term has grown to refer to how people’s understanding of what a healthy ecosystem looks like has declined over time as each new generation has a lower baseline of what is considered a “normal” environment.’ Shifting baseline syndrome can lead to us thinking that things we see in nature are normal when, in fact, they are signs of problems in our environment. As spring progresses, and trees leaf out, you may notice that many leaves appear twisted, cupped, curled or otherwise deformed. While it may seem tempting to think that these deformities are a normal part of leaf formation because that's what leaves have looked like in past years, they are actually a sign of a growing problem in our natural areas– off target herbicide injuries. In this blog we’ll talk about what herbicides are, how they are getting into natural areas, and what the effects are in Illinois ecosystems.


What is an herbicide?

Herbicides are chemicals that are used to kill unwanted plants. They fall under the umbrella of pesticides, which are any chemicals used to kill living things that negatively impact productivity. Controlling weeds has been an important part of agriculture since people started cultivating plants 10,000 years ago. For most of this time, weeds were managed by hand pulling them or “cultural” methods. Cultural methods of weed control are different ways of creating an environment in which desired crops outcompete weeds. These methods can include crop rotation, cover cropping, and soil fertilization. However, in the 1950s everything about agriculture changed in what is called the green revolution. During this time, the invention of the Haber - Bosch process to create ammonium fertilizer from nitrogen gas, and the creation of herbicides allowed for large intensification of agriculture, greatly reducing the need for labor on farms and increasing yields.

Despite the most commonly used herbicides being brought to market between 1945 and 1975, the use of herbicides changed dramatically over time. In the past, herbicides were usually only sprayed preemergence– or before crops came up. However, with the introduction of genetically modified crops that are resistant to certain herbicides, they can be sprayed all growing season, or “over-the-top” of crops.. The most controversial of these has been soybeans that are resistant to 2,4-D and Dicamba, two herbicides that target broadleaf plants and would otherwise kill soybeans. These herbicides are also very prone to vapor drift, which occurs at temperatures over 80°F, meaning that spraying them in the summer drastically increases drift. Dicamba drift made national headlines as it not only affected natural areas but also farmers that weren’t growing resistant soybeans. Dicamba was first approved for over-the-top spraying during the growing season in 2016 by the EPA; however, it lost its approval for this kind of application in 2024 after a district court required the EPA to vacate the approval due to procedural violations.


How do herbicides drift?

Herbicide drift refers to herbicides moving from their intended target, usually an agricultural field or lawn, to anywhere they were not intended to be. There are two ways that herbicide drift can occur– particle drift and vapor drift. Particle drift occurs while herbicides are getting sprayed. It usually happens when applicators do not follow the regulations on herbicide labels by applying on windy days or having their sprayers at the wrong height. Vapor drift occurs after herbicides have been applied on hot days. The heat causes herbicides to volatilize, or, turn into a vapor. These vapors can then travel over a mile before being taken up by other plants. Vapor drift can occur even when herbicides are properly applied according to the label and up to 30 days after application. Not all herbicides volatilize at temperatures we normally find in the environment, but two common herbicides, 2,4-D and Dicamba, can volatilize at temperatures as low as 80°F. 


Herbicide Injury

Herbicide drift causes direct injuries to plants, and it leads to indirect damage to animals and ecosystems as a whole. Herbicide exposure can cause plants to have deformed leaves, produce fewer flowers, produce fewer fruits and nuts, have lower nutritional contents, cause limb dieback in trees, and even whole plant death in extreme cases. These injuries can have cascading effects across ecosystems, as plants are the basis of the food chain that all other living things rely on. The most visible of symptoms are deformed leaves on trees, making it the best way to identify herbicide exposures apart from sending samples to a lab for testing. Some common deformations are irregular margins, curling/cupping, chlorosis, necrosis, and strapping. Here is what these signs look like:


Chlorosis

Chlorosis refers to the yellowing of leaves as chlorophyll is depleted.

Irregular Margins

Irregular margins refer to the edges of a leaf having a different shape or pattern than they usually do.

Curled or Cupped Leaves

Curling is when the edges of leaves turn down. Cupping is when the edges of leaves turn up.

Necrosis 
Necrosis refers to a part or whole leaf dying.

Strapping
Strapping refers to leaves that are longer and narrower than they usually are. 

Extent of Herbicide Damage in Illinois

The Illinois Natural History Survey did a study of 185 sites in all counties in 2023. They found at least one pesticide in 74% of the tissues that they tested.  They also found herbicide injuries in trees at 99% of the sites that they visited and severe herbicide injuries at 54% of sites. Oaks were the most impacted of any species, which is especially concerning given that oaks are an incredibly important species in Illinois ecosystems. They found that herbicides were much more prevalent prior to July and other pesticides like insecticides and fungicides were much more prevalent after July 18. 


While it’s easy to miss the signs of herbicide injury when they’ve become part of our baseline, once you know what to look for— cupped leaves, yellowed veins, jagged margins—it’s impossible to ignore what they mean. It may seem overwhelming to see this damage in ecosystems we once thought of as healthy; however by recognizing herbicide injury for what it is, we can equip ourselves with the knowledge required to push for changes in how and when these chemicals are used, advocate for stronger protections for natural areas, and restore a more accurate baseline of what healthy ecosystems should look like. If you are interested in learning more about herbicide drift Prairie Rivers Network has more resources and a community science monitoring project for herbicide injuries.


Sources:

Benson, T. J., & Zaya, D. (2024). Understanding the extent and consequences of chemical trespass for Illinois ecosystems.

https://dnr.illinois.gov/content/dam/soi/en/web/dnr/inpc/documents/INHS%20-%20final%20report_.pdf


Erndt-Pitcher, K., & Martin, K. (2024). Hidden in Plain Sight. Prairie Rivers Network. https://prairierivers.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/HerbicideDrift-Report-

Update-12.19.24-LOCKED.pdf


Mesnage, R., Székács, A., & Zaller, J. G. (2021). 1 - Herbicides: Brief history, agricultural use, and potential alternatives for weed control. In R. Mesnage & J. G. Zaller

(Eds.), Herbicides (pp. 1–20). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823674-1.00002-X

RECENT ARTICLES

April 22, 2025
From the rugged peaks of the Rocky Mountains to golden desert canyons, the rolling prairies to the ancient, mist-shrouded Appalachian mountains — America is a land rich in many beauties. We are home to the towering redwoods of the west coast, sun-drenched coastlines in the south, and the deep blues of the Great Lakes that collectively hold the largest volume of freshwater on Earth. These wild places offer a kind of quiet that stirs the soul. This vast, varied land is what we proudly call “America the Beautiful.” And on Earth Day, this is the America we celebrate. We scroll through snapshots of National Parks, photos of mountain trails, canyon vistas, tidepools, and wildflower filled prairies. Maybe we've seen these places with our own eyes — maybe we carry them like a dream we hope to one day reach. We’ve all, in some way, been struck by the beauty of this land. As I write these words, I’m sitting at my desk looking out the window into the woodland of Severson Dells, watching the first green buds emerge, listening to the fluting whistles of returning songbirds. How lucky are we to live among such beauty? But that beauty is in danger. Today, mountaintops in Appalachia are being blown apart for coal, their peaks stripped and valleys buried in rubble. Ancient forests in the Pacific Northwest are leveled for lumber, their centuries-old trees felled in minutes. Oil rigs rise like metal skeletons in Alaska’s fragile tundra, while pipelines thread through sacred Indigenous lands and important wildlife corridors. Wetlands that once buffered our coastlines from hurricanes are drained and filled. Prairies, once stretching unbroken across the heart of the continent like an ocean of grass, are disappearing under pavement and plow. Our coastlines are receding. Our coral reefs, once vibrant, are dying, bleaching bone-white. Even here, outside my window, invasive honeysuckle strangles the understory where spring ephemerals once bloomed, and the chorus of birds is quieter than it used to be — a stark reminder that nearly one-third of North American bird populations have vanished in the past fifty years. But this isn’t a new story. Ours is not the first generation to witness the cost of ‘progress’. The tension between beauty and destruction has shaped this nation since the Industrial Revolution. And while the challenges we face today are daunting, they are not insurmountable. Every year, on April 22nd, we celebrate Earth Day – a day that itself was born from a moment not unlike our own. America of the 1950’s and 60’s is almost unrecognizable from the America we know today. In 1943, Los Angeles residents awoke one morning to skies so dark and chemical-laden they feared they were under a gas attack . It was smog. Just 5 years later, a lethal blanket of smog from zinc smelters in Pennsylvania killed 20 people in just three days . The Merrimack River in New Hampshire ran a different color each day , depending on what the local mills were dumping. And in 1969, Cleveland's Cuyahoga River — thick with oil and industrial waste — burst into flames , its smoke billowing four stories high. These weren’t isolated incidents. They were the symptoms of a larger crisis—one brought on by decades of industrial expansion with few, if any, environmental safeguards. At the same time that America was enjoying unprecedented prosperity, it was also polluting its air, poisoning its rivers, and sickening its people. The economy boomed, but the environmental consequences were growing harder to ignore. In 1962, a marine biologist named Rachel Carson published Silent Spring, a book that would become a cornerstone of the modern environmental movement. Carson’s work focused on the effects of chemical pesticides—especially DDT—on ecosystems and human health. She warned of a future without birdsong, where toxins accumulated in the food chain and sickened both wildlife and people. Silent Spring struck a chord. It didn’t just present scientific facts, it gave voice to a deep, growing unease. People were already noticing the changes around them: the absence of fireflies in summer, the increasing number of fish kills in local lakes, the haze that lingered over cities for days. Carson’s words helped connect the dots, and it didn’t just inform, it inspired, and from it spurred the beginning of the environmental movement. By the late 1960s, a wave of activism was sweeping the country. Young people were leading protests against the Vietnam War, civil rights leaders were marching for justice, and college campuses had become hotbeds of political energy. Watching this cultural shift with inspiration was Senator Gaylord Nelson of Wisconsin. A long-time advocate for environmental protection, Nelson saw how the antiwar movement had galvanized young people—and he wondered whether that same passion could be channeled into fighting a different kind of crisis: the growing threat to America’s air, water, and land. His sense of urgency only deepened in early 1969, when tragedy struck the California coast. A blowout at a Union Oil drilling platform off the coast of Santa Barbara spilled nearly 100,000 barrels of crude oil into the Pacific Ocean . Black sludge washed up on miles of pristine beaches. Seabirds lay dying under slicks of oil. Dolphins and seals washed ashore. The air reeked of petroleum for weeks. The images were devastating—and they were broadcast into homes across the nation. Senator Nelson knew the time to act was now. In November of that year, he announced plans for a "National Teach-In on the Crisis of the Environment" —a day when Americans would come together to learn, protest, and push for meaningful environmental change. This name was later changed to Earth Day, and the date chosen was April 22, 1970—strategically placed between spring break and final exams to ensure strong participation on college campuses.  To bring this ambitious vision to life, Nelson turned to Denis Hayes, a 25-year-old student activist. With Hayes’ help, a 7 month timeline, and a shoestring budget of just $124,000, Earth Day sparked an unprecedented nationwide movement. College campuses began planning teach-ins and events. Newspapers picked up the story. Civic groups, churches, and schools joined in. The momentum built quickly—and organically. Within a few months, the Earth Day idea had become a nationwide grassroots event supported by millions of people. Colleges campuses across the country organized “teach- ins”, and major newspapers were writing about Senator Nelson's ideas. Earth Day may have been Gaylord Nelson’s idea, but American citizens made it happen. “Earth Day worked because of the spontaneous response at the grassroots level,” reflected Gaylord Nelson. “It organized itself.” Historian Adam Rome would later call it “the most famous unknown event in modern American history.” On April 22, 1970, an estimated 20 million Americans—nearly 10% of the U.S. population at the time —participated in what remains the largest single-day political demonstration in the nation’s history. People from all walks of life gathered for marches, cleanups, rallies, and teach-ins. The message was clear: the environment mattered, and the public was ready to fight for it. What made Earth Day so powerful was not just its scale, but its unity. The movement crossed ideological lines. It was bipartisan, supported by both Democrats and Republicans. At a time of deep national division, Earth Day reminded Americans that the health of our planet is a shared responsibility—and a common cause. Even more remarkable is that this enormous, coordinated event was pulled off without the tools we rely on today. No social media. No email. No cell phones. Just passionate people, printed flyers, rotary phones, and the belief that change was possible. The success of Earth Day didn’t just move the public—it resonated with leaders in Washington, and led to real change. In just a few years, the United States went from having almost no federal environmental policy to enacting an environmental policy infrastructure strong enough to slow down the era of unregulated industrial sprawl to protect our planet and public health. The success of the first Earth Day led to the passage of some of the most important environmental legislation in American history, including: The Clean Air Act (1970) The Clean Water Act (1972) The Endangered Species Act (1973) President Richard Nixon oversaw the establishment of the Environmental Protection Agency and signed the above landmark environmental laws into effect. In a 1970 speech, Nixon captured the spirit of the moment with a message that still rings true today: “The great question of the seventies is, shall we surrender to our surroundings, or shall we make our peace with nature and begin to make reparations for the damage we have done to our air, to our land, and to our water? Restoring nature to its natural state is a cause beyond party and beyond factions. It has become a common cause of all the people of this country. It is a cause of particular concern to young Americans, because they, more than we, will reap the grim consequences of our failure to act on programs which are needed now if we are to prevent disaster later. Clean air, clean water, open spaces—these should once again be the birthright of every American. If we act now, they can be. We still think of air as free. But clean air is not free, and neither is clean water. The price tag on pollution control is high. Through our years of past carelessness we incurred a debt to nature, and now that debt is being called. ” In the years that followed the first Earth Day, America made progress—rivers stopped catching fire, cities began to breathe a little easier, and wildlife rebounded. But the work was never meant to end in the 1970s. Earth Day is a reminder that the environment is not a limitless resource, and that protecting it requires action, accountability, and cooperation. Fifty five years later we face new environmental challenges, but Earth day is a reminder of what we can accomplish when we come together, regardless of party or background, to protect the natural world we all share. Today, the landmark pieces of legislation that were established in the 1970’s are under threat. The first hit to the Clean Water Act was the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Sackett v. EPA, which significantly narrowed the Act's scope, limiting protections for wetlands and many streams. This ruling has led to a significant weakening of federal oversight. More recently, the EPA has announced significant changes to the Clean Water Act that potentially puts the drinking water sources for tens of millions of Americans at risk. As for the Endangered Species Act, there is a proposed rule change that would limit violations of the Act only to actions that hurt or kill animals. Harming the habitats the endangered animals need to survive would no longer be a violation of the Endangered Species Act, which would open large swaths of land to logging, mining and development that were previously protected. As we all know, if a species doesn’t have the habitat to survive and breed in then it will eventually go extinct. This proposed rule change is open for public comment until May 19 in the Federal Register, so please consider sharing your opinion . Additionally, there is the Zero-Based Regulatory Budgeting To Unleash American Energy Executive Order. The legal community is still trying to figure out just how far reaching this EO is, but it is likely to have a significant impact on a wide range of environmental regulations. These threats to the health of our environment put “America the Beautiful” at risk. The spacious skies, amber waves of grain, purple mountain majesties, and the fruited plain from sea to shining sea are left vulnerable. Now more than ever, Earth Day calls on all of us to act to protect our beautiful environment. Earth Day is now celebrated in over 190 countries. But its roots lie in a time when people refused to accept the destruction of the world around them as inevitable. So, what will you do this Earth Day? Because history has shown us: when people care, when they act together, the world changes. The debt to nature is still being called—and we still have the power to answer. This Earth Day, don’t just celebrate – participate. Plant a tree. Call your representatives. Learn the name of the bird outside your window. Donate to organizations that support our natural lands, our water, and our future. Vote. Teach your children not just to love the Earth, but to fight for it. Talk about climate change, even when it’s hard. Especially when it’s hard. Use your voice, use your art, use your science. Join a local cleanup, start a compost bin, reduce your plastic use. Talk to your neighbors. Talk to your parents. Talk to your children. You can’t wait for someone else to take action. You don’t need to be perfect. You don’t need to do everything. But you do need to begin. Because the Earth doesn’t need more perfect people, it needs millions of imperfect people who care enough to act with intention everyday. Sources: Klein, Ezra, and Thompson, Derek. Abundance . Simon & Schuster, 18 March 2025 “Gaylord Nelson & Earth Day Origins.” Nelson Earth Day , https://nelsonearthday.net/gaylord-nelson-earth-day-origins/ . Accessed 18 Apr. 2025. Gammon, Katharine. “The Deadly Donora Smog of 1948 Spurred Environmental Protection—But Have We Forgotten the Lesson?” Smithsonian Magazine , 26 Oct. 2018, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/deadly-donora-smog-1948-spurred-environmental-protection-have-we-forgotten-lesson-180970533/ . Accessed 18 Apr. 2025. Lamoreaux, Naomi. “The 1943 Hellish Cloud Was the Most Vivid Warning of L.A.'s Smog Problems to Come.” Smithsonian Magazine , 15 Jan. 2018, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/1943-hellish-cloud-was-most-vivid-warning-las-smog-problems-come-180964119/ . Accessed 18 Apr. 2025. “The Merrimack River: How Revisiting Its History Helps Renew Action.” Forest Society Blog , Society for the Protection of New Hampshire Forests, 26 Sept. 2022, https://www.forestsociety.org/blog-post/merrimack-river-how-revisiting-its-history-helps-renew-action . Accessed 18 Apr. 2025. Pyne, Stephen J. “The Cuyahoga River Caught Fire at Least a Dozen Times, but No One Cared Until 1969.” Smithsonian Magazine , 22 June 2019, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/cuyahoga-river-caught-fire-least-dozen-times-no-one-cared-until-1969-180972444/ . Accessed 18 Apr. 2025. Westervelt, Eric. “How California’s Worst Oil Spill Turned Beaches Black and the Nation Green.” NPR , 28 Jan. 2019, https://www.npr.org/2019/01/28/688219307/how-californias-worst-oil-spill-turned-beaches-black-and-the-nation-green . Accessed 18 Apr. 2025.
By Emma Zimmerman April 16, 2025
Disclaimer: Severson Dells Nature Center is not a medical provider and is not giving medical advice in the following article. Please consult a licensed medical professional for any questions regarding your personal health.
By Linda Sandquist April 11, 2025
Introducing Linda